Jacques Attali: "The plight of children is particularly difficult to resolve. This development will be complemented by what I call, not" s rights Child " but by "the right to childhood" is to speak of children as if they were adults. For children whose parents are nomads sentimentally, the right to childhood is the right to believe in Santa Claus, to be loved, to have someone who tells stories to live a life free , without any constraint, a right to permanence of love around you. If a company is unable to establish this right for children-the most subversive today, the most-difficult, if polyunion destabilizes even more living children, we have a society of solitudes juxtaposed in the network of multiple loves. Stability children, the right to assume that children have children of their residences, stable cross where their parents, who will tear over the "custody" of children (word absurd, because what are the prisoners?). "
I'm glad to know that I will not live this mutation announced. The woman would win maybe, for some years, in terms of a freedom loving, but the mother and The child will be in greater emotional and financial insecurity. Should a law requiring every man is likely to be the father of an unborn child, take a test DNA so that it contributes to the hardware support of the child? All fathers clubbed they equally or for rent? To defray the cost of daycare? etc ... A loss is expected and for man and woman and even a greater dropout of children is possible ... It is already difficult in our current system of having consistency in payment of alimony ... it took a law! Ah! What mess! Is this really a positive development?
0 comments:
Post a Comment